KARAKTERISTIK DAN ATRIBUT PRODUK TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN JAMU GENDONG DI DESA KIRINGAN, JETIS, BANTUL, YOGYAKARTA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui karakteristik dan atribut yang menjadi keputusan pembelian jamu gendong di Desa Kiringan. Jumlah responden sebanyak 100 orang yang dipilih secara acak. Metode analisis dalam penelitian ini menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan analisis fishbein. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa konsumen jamu gendong di dominasi berjenis kelamin perempuan, rata-rata usia 21-30 tahun, berstatus menikah, pendidikan terakhir SMA, dan memiliki pendapatan perbulan < Rp.1.500.000,00. Atribut yang menjadi keputusan pembelian jamu gendong ada 11 atribut yaitu meliputi rasa, khasiat, komposisi, merek, kemasan, harga, keamanan, kemudahan dan ketersediaan. Atribut yang menjadi pertimbangan keputusan pembelian yaitu atribut khasiat, atribut rasa, dan atribut keamanan. Dengan total skor khasiat 8,05, rasa 6,57, keamanan 5,76. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa konsumen sebelum membeli memperhatikan manfaat yang ada pada produk dan rasa yang menjadi pertimbangan pembelian ulang. Kata kunci : Karakteristik, Atribut, Jamu, Keputusan Pembelian
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it