MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386262822 · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-3668-7_12

Post-Quantum Cryptographic Schemes for Security Enhancement in 5G and B5G (Beyond 5G) Cellular Networks

2023· book-chapter· en· W4386262822 on OpenAlexaff
Saurabh Bhatt, Bharat Bhushan, Tanya Srivastava, V. S. Anoop

Bibliographic record

VenueSpringer tracts in electrical and electronics engineering · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCryptographyCellular networkBroadbandComputer securityComputer networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract 5G is the fifth generation of broadband cellular network and beyond 5G can be the 6G, which will be the sixth generation of broadband cellular network. Even though studies about 5G are still evolving, 6G has become a hot topic for cellular researchers these days. The expansion in the field of 5G and 6G is still in infancy stage as many problems still need to be solved. Out of these, security of data transmission is a premier concern. Therefore, cybersecurity is becoming increasingly important for these cellular networks. This paper is focused upon providing the in-depth overview of 5G and B5G networks. The paper aims to evaluate the insights of the security services of 6G networks and outlines various data security techniques used by 5G networks. The paper also provides introduction to quantum computing for cryptography and evaluates various post-quantum cryptography techniques. Finally, some novel research trends and directions in correlation of security of 5G and beyond 5G networks are listed to guide further research in the area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpringer tracts in electrical and electronics engineeringSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207