MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386266723 · doi:10.11159/ijci.2023.008

Numerical Modelling of Permafrost Degradation Effects on Rock Slopes

2023· article· en· W4386266723 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
William Boffelli, Francesco Calvetti

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Civil Infrastructure · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostGeologyDegradation (telecommunications)Geotechnical engineeringGeomorphologyEarth scienceEngineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rockfalls and rockslides are being observed with increased frequency in high mountains during last decades.Permafrost degradation, driven by global warming, is considered to be the main triggering factor.This paper describes a series of Distinct Element simulations of a selected rock face, where the presence of ice in joints is taken into consideration.These simulations are part of a wider multiscale approach to modelling of potentially rock slopes.Previous research at the material scale (ice and frozen soil) allowed defining an original failure criterion for continuous and discontinuous rock joints filled with ice.This criterion is now included in large scale DEM model of punta Gnifetti (4554 m asl -Monte Rosa massif) in order to reproducing the actual configuration through back-analysis based on geomechanical investigation, and assessing evolutionary scenarios driven by the increase of persistence and of temperature.Relevant numerical issues, regarding boundary conditions and model generation are preliminary discussed, as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Civil InfrastructureSame topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207