Differentially Private Federated Multi-Task Learning Framework for Enhancing Human-to-Virtual Connectivity in Human Digital Twin
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ensuring reliable update and evolution of a virtual twin in human digital twin (HDT) systems depends on any connectivity scheme implemented between such a virtual twin and its physical counterpart. The adopted connectivity scheme must consider HDT-specific requirements including privacy, security, accuracy and the overall connectivity cost. This paper presents a new, secure, privacy-preserving and efficient human-to-virtual twin connectivity scheme for HDT by integrating three key techniques: differential privacy, federated multi-task learning and blockchain. Specifically, we adopt federated multi-task learning, a personalized learning method capable of providing higher accuracy, to capture the impact of heterogeneous environments. Next, we propose a new validation process based on the quality of trained models during the federated multi-task learning process to guarantee accurate and authorized model evolution in the virtual environment. The proposed framework accelerates the learning process without sacrificing accuracy, privacy and communication costs which, we believe, are non-negotiable requirements of HDT networks. Finally, we compare the proposed connectivity scheme with related solutions and show that the proposed scheme can enhance security, privacy and accuracy while reducing the overall connectivity cost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it