MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386277882 · doi:10.1016/s2152-2650(23)01205-3

MDS-634 Efficacy and Safety of Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine (ASTX727) in the CMML Subpopulation from Phase 2 and ASCERTAIN Phase 3 Studies

2023· article· en· W4386277882 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael R. Savona, James McCloskey, Elizabeth A. Griffiths, Karen Yee, Amer M. Zeidan, Aref Al‐Kali, H. Joachim Deeg, Prapti A. Patel, Mitchell Sabloff, Mary‐Margaret Keating, Nancy Zhu, Nashat Gabrail, Salman Fazal, Joseph Maly, Olatoyosi Odenike, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Amy E. DeZern, Casey L. O’Connell, Gail J. Roboz, Lambert Busque, Rena Buckstein, Harshad Amin, Jasleen K. Randhawa, Brian Leber, Kim‐Hien Dao, Yuri Sano, Beloo Mirakhur, Winny Chan, Aram Oganesian, Harold Keer, Guillermo Garcia‐Manero

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreJuravinski Cancer CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontUniversity of Alberta HospitalQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentrePrincess Margaret Cancer CentreOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical CampusSchool of Medicine, Vanderbilt UniversityYale Cancer CenterYale UniversityVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer CenterVanderbilt UniversityLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterRoswell Park Cancer Institute
KeywordsDecitabinePhase (matter)MedicineInternal medicineOncologyChemistryBiologyGeneticsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueClinical Lymphoma Myeloma & LeukemiaSame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207