MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nucleation Curves of Ice in Dilute Salt Solutions

2023· article· en· W4386279594 on OpenAlexafffund
Xin Zhang, Huazhou Li, Nobuo Maeda

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsChemistryNucleationInorganic chemistryBromidePotassiumSalt (chemistry)Lithium chlorideSodiumElectrolyteLithium (medication)IodideHydrateSodium bromideChlorideLithium iodideMelting pointClathrate hydratePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrolytes have been used as thermodynamic ice inhibitors since they can depress the melting point of ice by lowering the activity of water. However, the kinetic aspects of electrolytes on ice nucleation have been unclear. Here we report an experimental study of the nucleation rate of ice in quasi-free droplets of eight dilute monovalent salt solutions suspended at an interface between two immiscible liquids of perfluoromethyldecalin and squalane. The studied salts were sodium chloride (NaCl), potassium chloride (KCl), lithium chloride (LiCl), sodium bromide (NaBr), potassium bromide (KBr), lithium bromide (LiBr), sodium iodide (NaI), and potassium iodide (KI). The results showed that some monovalent salts increased the nucleation rate of ice at low supercoolings (high temperatures), and this increase was largely independent of the salt concentrations up to 100 mM. This finding is in marked contrast to the previous finding that the same combinations of the monovalent salts promoted the nucleation of methane–propane mixed gas hydrates, suggesting that a fundamental difference may exist between the nucleation mechanisms of ice and clathrate hydrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207