MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386280911 · doi:10.7202/1102705ar

Adaptation, dérives et dérèglements. Le devenir-opéra de « The Handmaid’s Tale » selon Paul Bentley

2023· article· fr· W4386280911 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marie-Lise Paoli

Bibliographic record

VenueCaptures · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesOperaAdaptation (eye)Art historyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 2022, l’English National Opera présente une nouvelle production de l’opéra de Poul Ruders adapté de The Handmaid’s Tale, un roman fondé sur les dérives totalitaires d’un projet utopique dont les dérèglements sont la matière même de l’intrigue. Cet article interroge le rapport à la règle dans les métamorphoses intermédiales qui jalonnent la genèse de l’oeuvre, telles que relatées par son librettiste, Paul Bentley, dans un ouvrage quelque peu irrévérencieux qu’il consacre aux arcanes de cette création musico-littéraire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.040
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCapturesSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207