Effects of the Magnetic Field and Thickness of Layers on Intersubband Absorption in Asymmetric Double Parabolic Quantum Wells
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This numerical study scrutinizes the impact of both the thickness of layers and an externally applied magnetic field on the optical absorption coefficient and alterations in the refractive index pertaining to the intersubband optical transition (1-2) within an asymmetric double parabolic structure, utilizing GaAs/AlGaAs quantum wells as a basis.Energy levels and their corresponding wave functions have been ascertained through the use of the shooting method.The findings of this investigation suggest a pronounced sensitivity of the optical absorption coefficient and changes in the refractive index to the thickness of the layers and the applied external magnetic field.It has been observed that the intensification of the magnetic field results in a resonant peak position shifting towards higher energy values, whereas the thickness of the layers exerts an influence on the resonance peak magnitude.The insights derived from this study hold considerable potential for application, particularly in the development of optical devices predicated on intersubband electronic transitions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it