MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386289799 · doi:10.1002/cjce.25080

A deep graph convolutional network model of <scp>NOx</scp> emission prediction for coal‐fired boiler

2023· article· en· W4386289799 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yingnan Wang, Chunhui Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsNOxBoiler (water heating)Computer scienceGraphProcess engineeringCombustionEngineeringTheoretical computer scienceChemistryWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract To deal with environmental problems caused by NOx production in thermal plants, it is imperative to establish a reliable model to predict NOx concentration in the combustion process. NOx formation in a coal‐fired boiler is complex, and many variables affect NOx emissions. The effective information fusion of these variables can improve the accuracy of NOx concentration prediction. However, the existing NOx prediction algorithms based on thermal parameters rarely consider the mechanical knowledge of the boiler operation, and it is not easy to incorporate the topological information of production into modelling. Therefore, a graph convolutional network is proposed for NOx emission prediction. First, the key variables affecting NOx generation are selected according to the knowledge and the random forest‐based variable importance. Then, the model structure is designed by exploring the topological information among thermal variables to capture the complex spatial dependence. The model inputs are constructed by coding different operation variables, and the adjacency matrix is generated according to the correlation information between variables, which can fuse data information and reduce redundancy. On this basis, the prediction model of NOx concentration is established. Historical data from a 660 MW coal‐fired boiler are used in the experiment. The prediction results show that the proposed model can effectively fuse the information of characteristic variables and fully exploit the non‐linear mapping relationship between process variables and NOx emission. When compared with three typical models in NOx modelling, the proposed model has better performance with a determination coefficient of 0.906.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicAir Quality Monitoring and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207