UMA ANÁLISE DA PERCEPÇÃO DA LOGÍSTICA REVERSA NO DESCARTE DE MEDICAMENTOS DOMICILIARES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabalho tem como escopo analisar as percepções sobre a logística reversa no que se refere ao descarte de medicamentos domiciliares, destacando o nível de conhecimento da população sobre os locais adequados e os impactos dos descartes inadequados desses fármacos. O referencial teórico expõe conceitos sobre devolução ou logística reversa, logística reversa e a legislação de descarte de medicamentos, e o impacto do descarte de medicamentos no bem-estar populacional e no meio ambiente. O método aplicado foi uma pesquisa exploratória e um estudo de caso na localidade de Taboão da Serra/SP. Foram entrevistadascento e vinte (120) pessoas, que responderam presencialmente quinze questões, previamente aprovadas pela CEP. A verificação dos dados foi decomposta em duas partes: determinação do perfil dos respondentes e percepção destes sobre o teor da pesquisa. As deliberações atingidas mostram a escassez de meios para o descarte adequado desses fármacos, a educação ambiental diminuta, e o desprovimento de uma consciência ambiental que dificulta o cumprimento das leis sobre o descarte correto de medicamentos prescritos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".