Un nouveau sanctuaire chez les Voconces ? Le site de La Condamine à Pontaix (Drôme)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Located along a meander of the Drôme river, the site of Condamine has been known since the nineteenth century to contain the remains of a villa, including a mosaic which was removed in 1974. Since then, new opportunities to document the site, through aerial photography and subsequent pedestrian surveys conducted by the Museum of Die and Diois in June 2009, identified a large tri-portico Roman sanctuary, whose plan, characteristic of those throughout the Mediterranean, echoes in particular that of La Bâtie-Montsaléon (Mons Seleucus) (Leveau, Segard 2002). Five miles downstream from Die (Colonia Dea Augusta Vocontiorum), this monumental sanctuary (80 x 60 m) is located on the edge of the via Vocontia, a road connecting the Rhone to Italy by way of the valleys of the Drôme, and Durance rivers. Archaeological testing has identified that the substantial masonry foundations of this sanctuary cut through nearly 1,50 m of stratigraphy, including occupations separated by demolition layers derived from earlier daub buildings. These late-Republican occupation levels, whose sediments are littered with faunal remains, fragments of ceramics, as well as a relatively dense concentration of small hearths, are associated with metal artefacts found elsewhere at the site : included amongst these are the upper portions of two handles of simpulae representing the heads of a wolf and a duck. Two pits with ritual use, dated to late-Republican period, were also discovered during recent archaeological recording of a series of trenches related to the updating of the city’s sanitation network (Teyssonneyre et al. 2014). Like other indegenous sanctuaries which continue to be used during the Roman period in the south-eastern quarter of Gaul (Glanum, Nîmes, Nages …), and based on our observations, we advance the seductive hypothesis that this “ Laténien complex” was already used as a sacred area during the 2nd-1st centuries BC, and therefore predating the more substantial 1st-2nd century AD roman sanctuary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".