Pyrite stability and chalcophile element mobility in a hot Eocene forearc of the Pacific Rim Terrane, Vancouver Island, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The conditions of pyrite (Py) stability inform the extent of S mobility during prograde metamorphism, the formation of orogenic Au deposits, and the S cycle in subduction zones. The variables that affect Py stability and chalcophile element mobility are investigated in the Pacific Rim Terrane of Vancouver Island, Canada, where sulfide-bearing carbonaceous sediments have been metamorphosed from 230 to 600 °C and 4 kbar by mid-ocean ridge subduction in a hot fore arc setting during the Eocene. The petrographic evidence in the rocks shows Py can coexist with pyrrhotite (Po) over a wide temperature window to >550 °C as preserved in porphyroblasts of andalusite, staurolite, and garnet. Conversely, equilibrium phase diagrams constructed for the rock compositions conflict with observations and suggest the breakdown of primary Py occurs over a narrow temperature range below 400 °C. The phase diagrams are consistent with the coexistence of Py and Po up to lower amphibolite facies only if S locally comprises a much greater proportion involved in a reaction than that of the overall bulk-rock composition used in the calculations. While the chemistry of the bulk rocks and Po included in porphyroblasts show mobilization of H2O and S with increasing metamorphic grade of the forearc, this process appears unrelated to the distribution of chalcophile elements or Au deposits found in the Pacific Rim Terrane.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".