MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386307345 · doi:10.18280/ts.400413

Implementation of YOLOv5 for Real-Time Maturity Detection and Identification of Pineapples

2023· article· en· W4386307345 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Trung Hai Trinh

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaturity (psychological)Identification (biology)Computer scienceBiologyPsychologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The assurance of fruit freshness during harvest is an enduring challenge that is faced by farmers and suppliers.Traditional methodologies, currently utilized for evaluating fruit freshness, have been characterized by their time-consuming nature, high costs, laborintensity, and susceptibility to inaccuracies.To address these issues, machine-based detection and sorting systems have been proposed, offering increased efficiency by leveraging technological advancements to analyze fruit attributes such as color, texture, physical appearance, size, and shape.These attributes are critical determinants of fruit quality and value, making accurate fruit evaluation a necessity in the agricultural and food industries.This is particularly true for products such as organic juices and jams, which have significant implications for human health.Providing unfit fruits not only affects the economy adversely but also contributes to augmented carbon dioxide emissions.This work presents a novel technical solution for the detection of pineapple freshness on Vietnamese farms, employing the Fast R-CNN and YOLOv5 techniques.The YOLO model was trained on a diverse dataset, comprised of over a hundred object categories and 50,000 preprocessed images.An aggregated model, combining the outputs of the pre-trained and transfer models, demonstrated improved performance while reducing training time, owing to the extensive training dataset.The classifier displayed an impressive accuracy sensitivity of 94.5% when tested on 50,000 images.Experimental results validate the superior performance of the trained YOLOv5s model, which attains a ripe pineapple recognition accuracy of 98%, outperforming Faster R-CNN by 9.27% and trailing behind YOLOv5x by a mere 0.22%.Additionally, the YOLOv5s model exhibits an impressive detection speed, requiring only 9.2ms to detect a single image-67.88%faster than Faster R-CNN and only 34.06% slower than YOLOv5x.These findings confirm that the YOLOv5s target recognition model meets the requirements for accurate recognition and high-speed processing of ripe pineapples.Its compatibility with agricultural-embedded mobile devices makes it a prime candidate for supporting precision operations in ripe pineapple harvesting machines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207