Digital Microfluidics for Microproteomic Analysis of Minute Mammalian Tissue Samples Enabled by a Photocleavable Surfactant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proteome profiles of precious tissue samples have great clinical potential for accelerating disease biomarker discovery and promoting novel strategies for early diagnosis and treatment. However, tiny clinical tissue samples are often difficult to handle and analyze with conventional proteomic methods. Automated digital microfluidic (DMF) workflows facilitate the manipulation of size-limited tissue samples. Here, we report the assessment of a DMF microproteomics workflow enabled by a photocleavable surfactant for proteomic analysis of minute tissue samples. The surfactant 4-hexylphenylazosulfonate (Azo) was found to facilitate fast droplet movement on DMF and enhance the proteomics analysis. Comparisons of Azo and n -Dodecyl β- d -maltoside (DDM) using small samples of HeLa digest standards and MCF-7 cell digests revealed distinct differences at the peptide level despite similar results at the protein level. The DMF microproteomics workflow was applied for the sample preparation of ∼3 μg biopsies from murine brain tissue. A total of 1969 proteins were identified in three samples, including established neural biomarkers and proteins related to synaptic signaling. Going forward, we propose that the Azo-enabled DMF workflow has the potential to advance the practical clinical application of DMF for the analysis of size-limited tissue samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".