MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386324444 · doi:10.1145/3609027.3609406

Infix-Extensible Record Types for Tabular Data

2023· article· en· W4386324444 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Database Systems and Queries
Canadian institutionsGoogle (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceConcatenation (mathematics)Data typeTable (database)Class (philosophy)Frame (networking)Benchmark (surveying)Programming languageExtensibilityTheoretical computer scienceArtificial intelligenceData miningArithmeticMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a novel row-polymorphic record calculus, supporting a unique combination of features: scoped labels, first-class labels and rows, and record concatenation. Our work is motivated by the similarity of record types and data table (or data frame) schemas, commonly used in data processing tasks. After presenting our record calculus, we demonstrate its applicability to data frame manipulation by showing that it can be used to successfully assign types to the functions listed in the Brown Benchmark for Tabular Types. Our typing discipline is remarkably lightweight, compared to calculi that require reasoning about type-level constraints when manipulating record types, making it a viable candidate for practical use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Database Systems and QueriesFrench-language works237,207