MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386325383 · doi:10.18280/ts.400440

A Multilevel De-Noising Approach for Precision Edge-Based Fragmentation in MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation

2023· article· en· W4386325383 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Prathipati Silpa Chaitanya, Susanta Kumar Satpathy

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicImage Processing Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFragmentation (computing)SegmentationArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brain tumors, the second leading cause of mortality as identified by numerous health agencies, constitute a significant health challenge.Given the integral role of the brain in governing essential functionalities, such as memory, vision, learning, and problem-solving, early detection of malignant brain tumors is critical for effective medical intervention.Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), demonstrating superior precision and reliability over Computed Tomography (CT), is a preferred modality for brain cancer identification.This study introduces an innovative approach to brain tumor detection and segmentation, utilizing fragmentation.Fragmentation, a promising method for brain cancer analysis, involves the differentiation of cancerous tissue from other brain components, such as fatty tissue, edema, normal brain matter, and cerebrospinal fluid.The critical role of denoising in this process, which entails iterative thresholding until the tumor is appropriately segregated, is examined.Further, the use of image classification for distinguishing abnormal regions indicative of a brain tumor in MRI scans is outlined.The proposed Multilevel De-noising model with Precision Edge-based Fragmentation for Tumor Size Diagnosis (MD-PES-TSD) is presented as a comprehensive framework for the detection and segmentation of MRI images.The MD-PES-TSD model is designed to effectively reduce image noise, identify structural brain edges, differentiate between abnormal and normal brain regions, and ultimately determine the size of the tumor.An evaluation of MRI data scans segregated into gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) regions, following the implementation of early-stage denoising in the pre-processing phase and feature extraction through segmentation, is conducted.The MD-PES-TSD model is shown to outperform existing models in comparative analysis, signifying its potential as an effective solution for brain tumor detection and segmentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicImage Processing Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207