Validation and in vivo characterization of research antibodies for Moesin, CD44, Midkine, and sFRP-1.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Background:</ns4:bold> A major goal of the Target Enablement to Accelerate Therapy Development for Alzheimer’s disease (TREAT-AD) program is to develop and identify high-quality tools to test target or mechanistic hypotheses. As part of this initiative, it is important that commercial reagents including research antibodies being used to interrogate drug targets have confirmed validation data in knock-out cell lines. Ideally, these antibodies should also have utility for both <ns4:italic>in vitro</ns4:italic> and <ns4:italic>in vivo</ns4:italic> studies such that the levels of target proteins in target tissues can be quantified. </ns4:p> <ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Methods:</ns4:bold> We evaluated commercial antibodies against TREAT-AD protein targets Moesin (Uniprot ID: P26038), CD44 (Uniprot ID: P16070), Midkine (Uniprot ID: P21741) and Secreted frizzled-related protein 1, referred to as “sFRP-1” (sFRP-1; Uniprot ID: Q8N474). Moesin, Midkine and sFRP-1, that were confirmed as selective based on data in knock-out cell lines. Western blot analysis was used to compare protein levels in brain homogenates from a mouse model with AD-relevant pathology (5XFAD) versus age-matched C57BL/6J control mice. </ns4:p> <ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Results:</ns4:bold> Anti-Moesin ab52490 reacted in mouse brain homogenate with a predicted molecular weight of 68 kDa. Moesin protein expression was 2.8 times higher in 5xFAD compared to WT. Anti-CD44 ab189524 reacted with a band at the predicted size of 82 kDa. CD44 protein expression was 1.9 times higher in 5xFAD compared to WT. Anti-Midkine AF7769 reacted with a band ~16 kDa and a 17.8 times greater expression in 5xFAD compared to WT. Anti-sFRP-1 ab267466 reacted with a band at 35 kDa as predicted. sFRP-1 protein expression was 11.9 times greater in 5xFAD compared to WT. </ns4:p> <ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Conclusions:</ns4:bold> These data confirm the utility of these selective commercially available antibodies against Moesin, CD44, Midkine, and sFRP-1 for <ns4:italic>in vivo</ns4:italic> studies in mice and provide insight into the use of 5XFAD mice for <ns4:italic>in vivo</ns4:italic> target engagement studies for these target proteins. </ns4:p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".