MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386326626 · doi:10.1145/3617996

A Cubic Algorithm for Computing the Hermite Normal Form of a Nonsingular Integer Matrix

2023· article· en· W4386326626 on OpenAlexaff
Stavros Birmpilis, George Labahn, Arne Storjohann

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Algorithms · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPolynomial and algebraic computation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsInvertible matrixInteger (computer science)CombinatoricsDimension (graph theory)Matrix multiplicationMatrix (chemical analysis)Multiplication (music)Hermite polynomialsBounded functionInteger matrixFreivalds' algorithmBinary logarithmDiscrete mathematicsAlgorithmSymmetric matrixMathematical analysisPure mathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Las Vegas randomized algorithm is given to compute the Hermite normal form of a nonsingular integer matrix A of dimension n . The algorithm uses quadratic integer multiplication and cubic matrix multiplication and has running time bounded by O(n 3 (log n + log ||A||) 2 (log n ) 2 ) bit operations, where || A ||= max ij | A ij | denotes the largest entry of A in absolute value. A variant of the algorithm that uses pseudo-linear integer multiplication is given that has running time (n 3 log || A ||) 1+ o (1) bit operations, where the exponent “ + o (1)” captures additional factors c 1 (log n ) c2 (loglog|| A ||) c3 for positive real constants c 1 ,c 2 ,c 3 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on AlgorithmsSame topicPolynomial and algebraic computationFrench-language works237,207