Transcriptional dysregulation and impaired neuronal activity in <i>FMR1</i> knock-out and Fragile X patients’ iPSC-derived models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The lack of fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) protein, due to a repression of the FMR1 gene, causes Fragile X syndrome (FXS), one of the most prevalent forms of syndromic autisms. The FMR1 gene codes for an RNA binding protein involved in the regulation of gene expression through RNA processing, control of local translation, and protein-protein interactions; processes that are crucial for proper brain development. Taking advantage of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technologies, we generated iPSC-derived cortical neural progenitors and cortical neurons from an FMR1 knock-out and patient cell line with the aim of identifying common phenotypes between the two cellular models. Using RNA sequencing, quantitative PCR and multielectrode array approaches, we assessed how the absence of the functional FMR1 gene affects the transcriptional profiles and the activities of iPSC-derived cortical neuronal progenitor cells (NPCs) and neurons with both models. We observed that FMR1 KO and FXS patient cells have a decrease in their mean firing rate; a cellular activity that can also be blocked by tetrodotoxin (TTX) application in wild-type active neurons. Relative to wild-type neurons, in FMR1 KO neurons, increased expression of presynaptic mRNA and transcription factors involved in the forebrain specification and decreased levels of mRNA coding AMPA and NMDA subunits were observed. Intriguingly, 40% of the differentially expressed genes were commonly deregulated between NPCs and differentiating neurons with significant enrichments in FMRP targets and Autism Related Genes found amongst downregulated genes. This implies that an absence of functional FMRP affects transcriptional profiles at the NPC stage, resulting in impaired activity and differentiation of the progenitors into mature neurons over time. These findings from the FMR1 KO lines were also shared with FXS patients’ iPSC-derived cells that also present with an impairment in activity and neuronal differentiation, illustrating the critical role of FMRP protein in neuronal development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".