MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386329286 · doi:10.1038/s41698-023-00425-5

Addressing racial and ethnic disparities in AACR project GENIE

2023· letter· en· W4386329286 on OpenAlex
Shawn M. Sweeney, Jessica A. Lavery, Hannah E. Fuchs, Jocelyn A. Lee, Samantha Brown, Katherine S. Panageas, Charles L. Sawyers, Philippe L. Bédard

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenpj Precision Oncology · 2023
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnic groupGeographyPolitical scienceSociologyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AACR Project GENIE is an open source, international, pan-cancer registry of real-world clinico-genomic data built by data sharing among a network of academic tertiary referral centers. We write in response to a recent report by Cheung and colleagues 1 who claim, based on an analysis of the distribution of race and ethnicity in GENIE and benchmarking those distributions to 2017 U.S. cancer incidences using CDC WONDER ( http://wonder.cdc.gov/cancer-v2017.html ), that “GENIE is not sufficiently powered to detect small yet potentially clinically meaningful differences between white and non-white patients in even the most common cancer types.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.274
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it