MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386331941 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3244360/v1

New Observational Projects in New Zealand for Verification of Radiation Belt Loss Processes in the Deep Inner Magnetosphere: Instrumentation and Initial Results

2023· preprint· en· W4386331941 on OpenAlexaff
Yuki Obana, K. Sakaguchi, M. Nosé, Keisuke Hosokawa, Peter Jaquiery, Satoko Saita, K. Shiokawa, Martin Connors, Akira Kadokura, Tsutomu Nagatsuma, Tanja Petersen

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsMagnetometerEarth's magnetic fieldMagnetosphereFluxgate compassGeomagnetic stormPhysicsGeophysicsIonosphereVan Allen radiation beltLocal timeStormInstrumentation (computer programming)Very low frequencyAtmospheric sciencesGeologyAstrophysicsMeteorologyMagnetic fieldAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper describes the instrumentation of, and the first results from, an upper atmospheric observation project conducted in New Zealand. We operate an all-sky aurora camera and a 64-Hz sampling induction magnetometer at Middlemarch, as well as 1-Hz sampling fluxgate magnetometers which have been operative at three stations in New Zealand, Middlemarch, Eyrewell and Te Wharau. Green and red auroras respectively corresponding to the 557.7 nm and 630.0 nm emissions were observed on the night of 5 Aug 2019. Pc1 pulsations were observed in the frequency range of ~0.2–1 Hz before and after a small (minimum Dst = –40 nT) geomagnetic storm during 4–6 October 2020. Before the geomagnetic storm, Pc1 pulsations with several center frequencies were observed regardless of local time. During the recovery phase, an IPDP (interval of pulsations of diminishing period) type of Pc1 and subsequent four intervals Pc1s were detected. The Ionospheric Alfvén Resonator (IAR) was also identified with spectral resonance structures during this magnetic storm. Lower harmonic modes of IAR were present throughout the local nighttime, but higher harmonic modes with frequency of 5– 15 Hz seemed to disappear at the onset time of substorms. This is the first report of IAR at such a high frequency range and this is the first IAR observation in the southern hemisphere. Examples of applying cross-phase analysis to observation data of fluxgate magnetometers are also given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.297
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics→French-language works237,207→