Oxidative stress mediates associations between preoperative psychosocial phenotype and pain-related outcomes at 6 months following total knee arthroplasty: a longitudinal cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Greater preoperative depression, anxiety, and pain catastrophizing are associated with more severe long-term pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In a secondary analysis of previously reported data, we tested the hypothesis that these associations are mediated by oxidative stress (OS). DESIGN: A mixed between/within-subjects longitudinal cohort design. SETTING: A single academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Osteoarthritis patients (n = 91; 62.6% female) undergoing unilateral TKA. METHODS: We assessed depression, anxiety, and catastrophizing, as well as markers of central sensitization (widespread pain, temporal summation of pain) preoperatively. Blood samples were then obtained immediately prior to intraoperative tourniquet placement for quantification of in vivo biomarkers of systemic OS, F2-isoprostanes and isofurans. Post-TKA pain intensity (numeric rating scale worst pain [NRS], McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 [MPQ-2]) and function (PROMIS Pain Interference) were assessed at 6 months following TKA. RESULTS: Greater preoperative depression, catastrophizing, and widespread pain were associated with higher intraoperative combined OS (F2-isoprostanes+isofurans/2), which was in turn associated with higher post-TKA pain intensity and worse function (P < .05). All preoperative phenotype predictors except anxiety were correlated positively with post-TKA pain and/or function (P < .05). Bootstrapped mediation analyses revealed significant (P < .05) indirect (mediated) effects of depression (NRS Worst Pain, MPQ-2, PROMIS Pain Interference), anxiety (MPQ-2, PROMIS Pain Interference), and catastrophizing (PROMIS Pain Interference) on adverse long-term post-TKA outcomes via elevated OS. Central sensitization-related predictors demonstrated only direct effects (P < .05) on post-TKA outcomes that were independent of OS mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the adverse impact of depression, anxiety, and pain catastrophizing on post-TKA pain and functional outcomes are mediated in part by elevated OS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".