Laïla Doss, une pionnière de la lutte contre la tuberculose en Égypte (1916-2015)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans son livre autobiographique publié en 2015, soit l’année de sa disparition, Laïla Doss raconte son travail social auprès des enfants de tuberculeux·ses en Égypte. Née dans une famille de riches propriétaires terriens coptes-orthodoxes à Assiout en 1916, la jeune fille fonda en 1936 l’Association féminine pour l’amélioration de la santé, dans le contexte réformiste de l’entre-deux-guerres. En confrontant le récit de Laïla Doss avec la littérature secondaire et le dépouillement des rapports de santé publique, l’article retrace certaines étapes de la vie de cette pionnière, en lien avec la lutte contre la tuberculose et la protection infantile, en insistant sur ses années de formation au temps de l’indépendance (1916-1936), puis sur la professionnalisation de son association à l’ère de la réforme sociale et du développement (1936-1954), avant de retracer l’évolution de son travail face au nassérisme et au libéralisme (1954-2015).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".