MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386360287 · doi:10.31004/joe.v6i1.4230

Pengaruh Angkatan Kerja dan Investasi terhadap Produk Domestik Regional Bruto di Provinsi Lampung

2023· article· en· W4386360287 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P. Damianus Feriyandri, Emi Maimunah

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal on Education · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)UnemploymentInvestment (military)Agricultural scienceDescriptive statisticsBusinessSample (material)EconomicsGeographyMathematicsStatisticsEconomic growthPolitical scienceEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to determine the impact of employment, open unemployment, and domestic investment on the economic growth of Lampung Province in Indonesia. The research sample consisted of data from Lampung Province in the first quarter of 2010 to the fourth quarter of 2022. The data source was obtained from the Central Bureau of Statistics of Lampung. Regression analysis using EViews 10 was used to analyze secondary data and time series in this study. This study used a quantitative descriptive approach, which proved to be the most effective method. The results of the study show that the variables of labor, open unemployment, and domestic investment have a significant influence on economic growth. This research is a valuable reference and provides insight for further exploration, helping to understand the impact of employment, open unemployment, and domestic investment on economic growth in Lampung Province.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal on EducationSame topicEconomic Growth and Fiscal PoliciesFrench-language works237,207