MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Early Crop Classification Based on Historical Annual Crop Inventory Data and Remote Sensing Data

2023· article· en· W4386361192 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yue Wu, Chunhua Liao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCropAgricultureFood securityGround truthTransferabilityGrowing seasonComputer scienceAgricultural engineeringRemote sensingGeographyMachine learningAgronomyEngineeringForestry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the growth of the global population and food demand, near real-time agriculture monitoring is of great significance to ensure future food security. Early-season crop classification mapping is essential for agricultural planning and management. At the early stages of crop growth, crop classification faces significant challenges due to the difficulty in obtaining ground truth data and the absence of remote sensing images. In this study, we present a method that effectively integrates historical crop inventory data into model construction to assist in the classification of near real-time remote sensing data. We conducted tests on corn, soybeans, and winter wheat near London, Ontario, Canada. Results show that the overall accuracy was 0.84 on June 10, 2021. Among these three crops, winter wheat achieved the highest classification accuracy, with an F1 score of 0.95. Overall, these results highlight the unique advantages of our approach in leveraging historical crop type data and the temporal transferability of the model. This method holds promise for providing new solutions to address challenges such as early-season crop identification and monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing in Agriculture→French-language works237,207→