Bibliographic record
Abstract
Developed from the Ising model, Ising machines are promising to be efficient domain-specific accelerators for solving combinatorial optimization problems (COPs). A simulated bifurcation (SB) algorithm enables an Ising machine to achieve massive parallelism in the simulation of Hamiltonian dynamics. Although SB significantly accelerates the search, more resources are required due to the use of continuous variables for the position of oscillators to obtain discrete spin states, compared to conventional simulated annealing. This article proposes ternary and multiple-value quantized SB (qSB) algorithms by discretizing the position variables used for the hardware-consuming multiply-accumulate (MAC) operations in SB. These quantization schemes do not only reduce the computational complexity, but also improve the solution quality for COPs. Specifically, the ternary qSB with dynamic threshold settings converts the MAC into addition and subtraction. To improve the precision in number representation when solving large-scale COPs, a uniform quantization scheme is applied to provide multiple-valued quantization. Alternatively, a logarithmic qSB leverages the evolution characteristics of position variables and implements multiplication by using simple shift operations. We demonstrate that using the proposed qSB improves the solution quality in a long search and accelerates energy convergence in a short search for solving COPs tackled by up to 2000 fully connected spins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".