MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Quantized Simulated Bifurcation for the Ising Model

2023· article· en· W4386361403 on OpenAlexafffund
Tingting Zhang, Jie Han

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceDiscretizationQuantization (signal processing)Ising modelSpeedupAlgorithmMathematicsApplied mathematicsParallel computingStatistical physicsPhysicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Developed from the Ising model, Ising machines are promising to be efficient domain-specific accelerators for solving combinatorial optimization problems (COPs). A simulated bifurcation (SB) algorithm enables an Ising machine to achieve massive parallelism in the simulation of Hamiltonian dynamics. Although SB significantly accelerates the search, more resources are required due to the use of continuous variables for the position of oscillators to obtain discrete spin states, compared to conventional simulated annealing. This article proposes ternary and multiple-value quantized SB (qSB) algorithms by discretizing the position variables used for the hardware-consuming multiply-accumulate (MAC) operations in SB. These quantization schemes do not only reduce the computational complexity, but also improve the solution quality for COPs. Specifically, the ternary qSB with dynamic threshold settings converts the MAC into addition and subtraction. To improve the precision in number representation when solving large-scale COPs, a uniform quantization scheme is applied to provide multiple-valued quantization. Alternatively, a logarithmic qSB leverages the evolution characteristics of position variables and implements multiplication by using simple shift operations. We demonstrate that using the proposed qSB improves the solution quality in a long search and accelerates energy convergence in a short search for solving COPs tackled by up to 2000 fully connected spins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207