Association Between Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation and Mortality Following Cardiac Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current guidelines recommend concomitant repair of certain non-severe cases of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, but the prognostic relevance and postsurgical impact of the TR remain uncertain. The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic impact of functional TR in patients undergoing diverse cardiac surgeries and to examine the effect-modifying role of patient characteristics in patients in whom TR confers a greater risk of adverse outcomes. Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass, aortic, and mitral valve surgery were included. Patients with severe TR, organic tricuspid valve pathology, undergoing tricuspid valve surgery or without a recent preoperative echocardiogram were excluded. Clinical variables were extracted from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. An independent cohort was used for external validation. Of 2,119 patients (mean age 67.4 years; 29% females), TR severity was moderate in 185 (9%), mild in 636 (30%), trivial in 1,126 (53%), and absent in 172 (8%). There were 238 deaths during the median follow-up period of 2.6 years. After adjusting for relevant factors, moderate TR was found to be independently associated with mid-term mortality (HR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.22-5.47) and with in-hospital mortality or major morbidity (OR: 3.18; 95% CI: 1.37-7.42). The association between TR and mortality was apparent when preoperative pulmonary artery systolic pressure was <40 mm Hg but not ≥40 mm Hg (P for interaction = 0.036). In this diverse cohort of contemporary cardiac surgery patients, moderate functional TR was associated with increased mortality and major morbidity, particularly in the absence of pulmonary hypertension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".