MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386386586 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2022-0325

Cluster Analysis To Explore Clinical Subphenotypes Of Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (Churg–Strauss)

2023· article· en· W4386386586 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emma Rubenstein, Carla Maldini, Augusto Vaglio, Federica Bello, Jan Phillip Bremer, Frank Moosig, Paolo Bottero, Alberto Pesci, Renato Alberto Sinico, Julian Großkreutz, Claudia Feder, David Saadoun, Giorgio Trivioli, Federica Maritati, Barbara Rewerska, Wojciech Szczeklik, Paolo Fraticelli, Giuseppe Guida, Gina Gregorini, Gianluca Moroncini, Bernhard Hellmich, Jochen Zwerina, Matthieu Resche‐Rigon, Giacomo Emmi, Thomas Neumann, Alfred Mahr

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGranulomatosis with polyangiitisEosinophilicMicroscopic polyangiitisAnti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodyInternal medicinePathologyVasculitisPancaGastroenterologyDermatologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Previous studies suggested that distinct phenotypes of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) could be determined by presence or absence of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), reflecting predominant vasculitic or eosinophilic processes, respectively. This study explored whether ANCA-based clusters or other clusters can be identified in EGPA. Methods This study used standardized data of 15 European centers for patients with EGPA fulfilling widely accepted classification criteria. We used multiple correspondence analysis, hierarchical cluster analysis, and a decision tree model. The main model included 10 clinical variables (musculoskeletal, mucocutaneous, ophthalmological, ENT, cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, renal, central or peripheral neurological involvement); a second model also included ANCA results. Results The analyses included 489 patients diagnosed in 1984–2015. ANCA were detected in 37.2% of patients, mostly P-ANCA (85.4%) and/or anti-myeloperoxidase (87.0%). Compared with ANCA-negative patients, those with ANCA had more renal (P<0.001) and peripheral neurological involvement (P=0.04), fewer cardiovascular signs (P<0.001) and fewer biopsies with eosinophilic tissue infiltrates (P=0.001). The cluster analyses generated four (model without ANCA) and five clusters (model with ANCA). Both models identified three identical clusters of 34, 39 and 40 patients according to the presence or absence of ENT, CNS and ophthalmological involvement. Peripheral neurological and cardiovascular involvement were not predictive characteristics. Conclusion Although reinforcing the known association of ANCA status with clinical manifestations, cluster analysis does not support a complete separation of EGPA in ANCA-positive and –negative subsets. Collectively, these data indicate that EGPA should be regarded as a phenotypic spectrum rather than a dichotomous disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicVasculitis and related conditions→French-language works237,207→