Some of 2021 nanoforums: ANM, ICANM, IMS, GTU nano, and HMT
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Some of 2021 nanoforums: ANM, ICANM, IMS, GTU nano, and HMT. / L. Chkhartishvili. – 2021–2022. – # 21/22. – pp. 309-322. – geo. There are given chronicles for five 2021 nanoforums: 17th International Conference on Advanced Nanomaterials, 2021 July 22 – 24, Aveiro, Portugal (ANM 2021); 8th International Conference and Exhibition on Advanced and Nanomaterials, 2021 August 9 – 11, Ottawa, Canada (ICANM 2021); 4th International Conference “Modern Technologies and Methods of Inorganic Materials Science”, 2021 September 20 – 21, Tbilisi, Georgia (IMS 2021); 6th International Conference “Nanotechnology” 2021 October 4 – 7, Tbilisi, Georgia (GTU nano 2021); and 7th International Materials Science Conference High Mat Tech, 2021 October 5 – 7, Kyiv, Ukraine (HMT 2021). Fig. 29.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it