MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386390424 · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41086-z

Reversal of trends in global fine particulate matter air pollution

2023· article· en· W4386390424 on OpenAlexaff
Chi Li, Aaron van Donkelaar, Melanie S. Hammer, Erin E. McDuffie, Richard T. Burnett, Joseph V. Spadaro, Deepangsu Chatterjee, Aaron Cohen, Joshua S. Apte, Veronica Southerland, Susan C. Anenberg, Michael Bräuer, Randall V. Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaHealth Canada
FundersNuclear Safety and Security CommissionWorld Health OrganizationNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsParticulatesAir pollutionEnvironmental sciencePollutionEnvironmental chemistryChemistryBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ambient fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) is the world’s leading environmental health risk factor. Quantification is needed of regional contributions to changes in global PM 2.5 exposure. Here we interpret satellite-derived PM 2.5 estimates over 1998-2019 and find a reversal of previous growth in global PM 2.5 air pollution, which is quantitatively attributed to contributions from 13 regions. Global population-weighted (PW) PM 2.5 exposure, related to both pollution levels and population size, increased from 1998 (28.3 μg/m 3 ) to a peak in 2011 (38.9 μg/m 3 ) and decreased steadily afterwards (34.7 μg/m 3 in 2019). Post-2011 change was related to exposure reduction in China and slowed exposure growth in other regions (especially South Asia, the Middle East and Africa). The post-2011 exposure reduction contributes to stagnation of growth in global PM 2.5 -attributable mortality and increasing health benefits per µg/m 3 marginal reduction in exposure, implying increasing urgency and benefits of PM 2.5 mitigation with aging population and cleaner air.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations158
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207