Spectral statistics of interpolating random circulant matrix and its applications to random circulant graphs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider a versatile matrix model of the form ${\bf A}+i {\bf B}$, where ${\bf A}$ and ${\bf B}$ are real random circulant matrices with independent but, in general, nonidentically distributed Gaussian entries. For this model, we derive exact results for the joint probability density function and find that it is a multivariate Gaussian. Arbitrary order marginal density therefore also readily follows. It is demonstrated that by adjusting the averages and variances of the Gaussian elements of ${\bf A}$ and ${\bf B}$, we can interpolate between a remarkably wide range of eigenvalue distributions in the complex plane. In particular, we can examine the crossover between a random real circulant matrix and a random complex circulant matrix. We also extend our study to include Wigner-like and Wishart-like matrices constructed from our general random circulant matrix. To validate our analytical findings, Monte Carlo simulations are conducted, which confirm the accuracy of our results. Additionally, we compare our analytical results with the spectra of adjacency matrices from various random circulant graphs. Despite the difference in entry distributions-Gaussian in our model and non-Gaussian in the adjacency matrices-the densities show excellent agreement in the large-dimension limit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".