MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386398620 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v15n10p13

An Economic Analysis of Meat Demand in Indonesia

2023· article· en· W4386398620 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Junaedi Junaedi, Muhammad Umar Burhan, Multifiah

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood and Agricultural Sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlmost ideal demand systemConsumption (sociology)Descriptive statisticsEconomicsWifeAgricultural economicsProduction (economics)MicroeconomicsStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meat is one of animal protein source which contains with good nutrition for human life. Consumption of meat is low than consumption of other animal protein sources because of its availability and expensive price. The objective of this study is to analyze of meat consumption pattern and the factors affecting it. The method used was descriptive and econometrics analysis. Specification of model was Quadratic of Almost Ideal Demand System (QUAIDS) and modified with size of household and wife education variable. Data used was the data of national socio-economic survey 2005, 2008, 2011, and 2014. Results of the study found that variation in the amount of meat consumption dependent on income level, price, education of wife, and size of household, also is closely related to the household area. Increasing consumption of meat as a source of animal protein was increase income, price stability, support the availability of meat at the household level, especially for low income also escorted with information about the important role of nutrients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.374
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and FinanceSame topicFood and Agricultural SciencesFrench-language works237,207