Interlaminar Response of LSI-Produced C/SiC Ceramic Matrix Composites: Experiments and Modelling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work investigates the interlaminar properties of a C/SiC composite produced by Liquid Silicon Infiltration, combining experiments based on Double Cantilever Beam tests and numerical analyses. Experimentally, a method to obtain pre-cracks with sharp tips at precise locations is proposed, and specimens with different thickness are used to investigate the effects of bending stress states in the delamination process. The properties of tri-linear Cohesive Zone Models for the modelling of delamination are identified numerically, by using automatic regression techniques without requiring additional assumptions or testing. Fiber bridging effects were observed and modelled, including the evaluation of the process zone lengths with different experimental, analytical, and numerical methods. Overall, the work provides a qualitative insight in the delamination process of long fiber reinforced C/SiC laminates produced with a cost-affordable technique and proposes an experimental and numerical protocol to characterize and model delamination phenomena, taking into account the scattering of material properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".