MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386408500 · doi:10.13162/hro-ors.v11i1.5403

Expanding the Scope of Community Pharmacy Practice in Nova Scotia: Impacts on Provincial COVID-19 Response

2023· paratext· en· W4386408500 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé · 2023
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersDepartment of Health, Western Cape GovernmentNova Scotia Department of Health and Wellness
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nova Scotia has expanded the scope of practice for community pharmacists by allowing, among other changes, pharmacist prescribing under specific circumstances (2011) and administration of drugs by injection (2013), thereby alleviating stress on the health system. Due to these progressive expansions in community pharmacy scope of practice, Nova Scotia community pharmacy personnel (about 1,500 pharmacists and 246 technicians working in 315 pharmacies) were rapidly able to play key roles in the province’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Community pharmacies provided medicines, medical devices, personal protective equipment, hand hygiene solutions, thermometers, and pulse oximeters to patients and the public. In addition, they have responded to patients’ COVID-19-related needs by treating symptoms; providing referrals; discussing the benefits and risks of COVID-19 vaccines and administering them; making nirmatrelvir/ritonavir assessments; and addressing vaccine hesitancy and the spread of misinformation about COVID-19. Moreover, as in some other provinces, community pharmacists in Nova Scotia have played a leading role in delivering COVID-19 vaccines from almost the start of the vaccination campaign in December 2020. Their role expanded further in May 2022, when pharmacists were granted prescribing authority for inhaled budesonide in accordance with the provincial protocol to treat mild SARS-CoV-2 respiratory symptoms. La Nouvelle-Écosse a élargi le champ d’exercice des pharmaciens communautaires en autorisant, entre autres, la prescription par un pharmacien dans des circonstances spécifiques (2011) et l’administration de médicaments par injection (2013), soulageant ainsi le système de santé. Grâce à ces élargissements progressifs du champ d’exercice des pharmacies communautaires, le personnel des pharmacies communautaires de Nouvelle-Écosse (environ 1 500 pharmaciens et 246 techniciens travaillant dans 315 pharmacies) a pu contribuer de manière cruciale et rapide à la réponse de la province à la pandémie de COVID-19. Les pharmacies communautaires ont fourni des médicaments, des dispositifs médicaux, des équipements de protection individuelle, des solutions pour l’hygiène des mains, des thermomètres et des oxymètres de pouls aux patients et au public. En outre, elles ont répondu aux besoins des patients liés à la COVID-19 en traitant les symptômes, en orientant les patients, en discutant des avantages et des risques des vaccins contre la COVID-19 et de leur administration, en évaluant la pertinence de traiter certains patients au nirmatrelvir/ritonavir et en répondant à l’hésitation vaccinale et à la diffusion d’informations erronées sur la COVID-19. De plus, les pharmaciens communautaires de Nouvelle-Écosse, comme ceux d’autres provinces, ont joué un rôle de premier plan dans l’administration des vaccins contre la COVID-19 dès le début de la campagne de vaccination en décembre 2020. Leur rôle s’est encore élargi en mai 2022, lorsque les pharmaciens ont été autorisés à prescrire du budésonide inhalé, conformément au protocole provincial, pour traiter les symptômes respiratoires légers du SRAS-CoV-2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.293
GPT teacher head0.513
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de SantéSame topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesFrench-language works237,207