MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386408727 · doi:10.24294/ace.v6i2.2202

Lipoproteins within the lymphatic system: Insights into health, disease, and therapeutic implications

2023· article· en· W4386408727 on OpenAlexaff
Malaz Yousef, Nádia Araci Bou‐Chacra, Neal M. Davies, Raimar Löbenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Chemical Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphatic System and Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChylomicronLymphatic systemLipoproteinLymphatic vesselDiseaseCholesterolVery low-density lipoproteinBiologyMedicineBiochemistryImmunologyInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This analysis of contemporary findings aims to enhance our understanding of lipoprotein biology within the lymphatic system and its relevance to human health and disease. It delves into the complex interrelationship between lipoproteins and the lymphatic system, encompassing their diverse classes and pivotal roles in the absorption and transport of drugs, vitamins, and xenobiotics. Lipoproteins consist of a hydrophobic core comprising non-polar lipids and a hydrophilic membrane composed of phospholipids, free cholesterol, and apolipoproteins. The lymphatic system collaborates with lipoproteins in the absorption and transport of dietary lipids. Simultaneously, it plays a vital role in the regulation of body fluid levels and acts as a formidable defense mechanism against infections. Lipoprotein classes encompass chylomicrons, chylomicron remnants, very low-density lipoproteins, intermediate density lipoproteins, low-density lipoproteins, high-density lipoproteins, and lipoprotein (a). Understanding the intricate relationship between lipoproteins and the lymphatic system holds immense implications for comprehending the underlying pathological processes of various diseases such as atherosclerosis, diabetes and obesity among others. By shedding light on the interplay between lipoproteins and the lymphatic system, this report underscores the significance of conducting research that contributes to the advancement of our knowledge in this field. Ultimately, such research paves the way for potential therapeutic interventions and novel strategies to address numerous disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Chemical EngineeringSame topicLymphatic System and DiseasesFrench-language works237,207