MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Spectro-Temporal Characterization of Tunable Supercontinuum Using X-FROG Measurements

2023· preprint· en· W4386413784 on OpenAlexaff
Bruno P. Chaves, Van Thuy Hoang, Vincent Couderc, Brent E. Little, David Moss, Roberto Morandotti, Benjamin Wetzel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilAgence Nationale de la RechercheEuropean Commission
KeywordsSupercontinuumFemtosecondLaserMaterials scienceOpticsPicosecondPhotonicsBroadbandOptoelectronicsFrequency combPhotonic-crystal fiberOptical fiberPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical wave-packet control and optimization is highly sought-after in numerous demanding applications. Recent advances have shown the potential of programable photonic integrated chips (PICs) [1] for enabling new optical functionalities. For instance, programmable delay lines (PDL) can be used for autonomous picosecond pulse shaping [2] as well as supercontinuum (SC) spectral shaping [3]. Recent work also demonstrated the potential of such approaches for gaining access to advanced spectro-temporal control [4] which would directly benefit applications such as nonlinear imaging and multiphoton microscopy [5]. Here, we demonstrate the spectro-temporal characterization and adaptive adjustment of broadband supercontinua (SC). The experimental setup shown in Fig. 1(a) comprises a femtosecond laser at 1550 nm, injected into an on-chip PDL [2]–[4] and used to generate a train of femtosecond pulses with a tunable pattern. This train of pulses is then amplified and sent into a highly nonlinear fiber (HNLF) to experience nonlinear spectral broadening. The broadband output SC spectrum is finally characterized via an X-FROG [6] setup that mixes the SC with an asynchronous femtosecond laser source (at 1040 nm) resulting in a sum-frequency generation (SFG) signal measured with a fast spectrometer. Here, the two lasers exhibit different yet stable repetition rates (i.e. locked but asynchronous), such that there is a constant frequency detuning yielding a fast scanning effect for the acquisition of the X-FROG spectrograms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207