A Comprehensive Review of MoS<sub><i>x</i></sub> for Improved Photo(electro)catalytic Performance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As an efficient hydrogen precipitation site, MoS x shows great promise for energy production and environmental remediation applications due to its low cost, easy modulation, multiple complex valence states, and excellent catalytic performance. Therefore, the development of MoS x synthesis strategies, catalytic enhancement mechanisms, and catalytic applications is reviewed. First, six synthesis strategies regarding MoS x are mainly outlined: electrochemical deposition, photodeposition, hydrothermal/solvent thermal, pulsed laser deposition, precipitation, and calcination, and their advantages and disadvantages are described in detail. Second, catalytic enhancement mechanisms of the composite strategies are elucidated based on the trends of MoS x electronic properties, valence species, light‐absorption range, and interfacial charge transfer. Third, applications of MoS x in photo(electro)catalysis in recent years are systematically reviewed. Finally, the current shortcomings and future research directions of MoS x are discussed from the perspectives of synthesis strategies and practical applications, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it