MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386415975 · doi:10.1080/19320248.2023.2245777

Incorporating Sustainable Food Systems into Practice: The Perceived Roles, Knowledge Needs, and Practice Barriers of Dietitians and Nutritionists from the Caribbean Region

2023· article· en· W4386415975 on OpenAlex
Katherine Bowes, Liesel Carlsson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
FundersAcadia University
KeywordsLeverage (statistics)SustainabilityWorkforceFood systemsPrioritizationExploratory researchPerceptionPublic relationsBusinessPolitical scienceSociologyPsychologyFood securityGeographySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Caribbean region food systems are unsustainable. Dietitians and nutritionists (D/N) are uniquely positioned to leverage food systems sustainability on multiple levels and in this region are motivated to facilitate change, but little is known about how to leverage this workforce to affect change. This exploratory study examines knowledge levels, perceptions about the role, and barriers and opportunities related to incorporating sustainable food systems (SFS) into practice. Participants perceived D/N have a role in supporting SFS, and a high level of knowledge. Societal barriers, such as prioritization of profits from food, present strong barriers. Recommendations for action at multiple levels are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it