MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386416219 · doi:10.1080/14788810.2023.2250964

Philistine imaginings and the naissance of a world other

2023· article· en· W4386416219 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Samiha Khalil

Bibliographic record

VenueAtlantic Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMiddle East Politics and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEnlightenmentPostmodernismIsraelitesHumanismHebrewRomanceClassicsHistoryPhilosophyLiteratureTheologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study traces the figure of the Philistine, its symbolic afterlife, in general, and its transatlantic circulatory logics, in specific. It follows the figure's ruptures and passages since it first emerged in Late Egyptian as P-r-s-t (transliterated: Peleset) and later on in Hebrew as פלשתי (transliterated: P'lishti) to signify an ancient people dating back to the twelfth century BCE, bearing the anthropological traces of the inhabitants of historical Palestine, and the biblical adversaries of the Israelites in the Old Testament (ca. 450 BCE). The study also examines the modern theological appearance of the Philistine in enlightenment philosophy – set in motion by way of Matthew Arnold’s Culture and Anarchy, following the German Romantic tradition – which subsequently shaped the theological epistemological foundations of the modern secular world, with serious effects on the rise of twentieth-century humanism, its racial logics, and on the postmodern constructions of the Palestinian question.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.059
Scholarly communication0.0120.010
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtlantic StudiesSame topicMiddle East Politics and SocietyFrench-language works237,207