Learning Nonprehensile Dynamic Manipulation: Sim2real Vision-Based Policy With a Surgical Robot
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Surgical tasks such as tissue retraction, tissue exposure, and needle suturing remain challenging in autonomous surgical robotics. One challenge in these tasks is nonprehensile manipulation such as pushing tissue, pressing cloth, and needle threading. In this work, we isolate the problem of nonprehensile manipulation by implementing a vision-based reinforcement learning agent for rolling a block, a task that has complex dynamics interactions, small scale objects, and a narrow field of view. We train agents in simulation with a reward formulation that encourages efficient and safe learning, domain randomization that allows for robust sim2real transfer, and a recurrent memory layer that enables reasoning about randomized dynamics parameters. We successfully transfer our agents from simulation to real and show robust execution of our vision-based policy with a 96.3% success rate. We analyze and discuss the success rate, trajectories, and recovery behaviours for various models that are either using the recurrent memory layer or are trained with a difficult physics environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".