MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386454727 · doi:10.1002/9781119210801.ch8

Material Design and Considerations for Metal Additive Manufacturing

2021· other· en· W4386454727 on OpenAlexaff
Ehsan Toyserkani, Dyuti Sarker, Osezua Ibhadode, Farzad Liravi, Paola Russo, Katayoon Taherkhani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRedistribution (election)Materials scienceNucleationMachiningSubtractive colorLiquid metalMicrostructureCrystallizationMetallurgyThermodynamicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Materials science is concerned with properties of solid materials, and the study of those properties and the way they are linked to material compositions and structures. Properties of materials are correlated with the microstructure, which can be modified by changing the microconstituents’ relative magnitude, known as phases. Additive manufacturing (AM) is differentiated from conventional subtractive machining techniques based on the subtraction of materials through cutting or milling. In the conventional casting or laser/electron-beam AM techniques, after melting, the liquid metal converts to a solid form through the cooling process known as solidification. Since AM comprises rapid melting of metallic materials, knowledge of the theory of solidification plays an important role in predicting and monitoring technique. The theory and mechanism of solute redistribution can be expressed using equilibrium and non-equilibrium models, considered in the vigorous conditions of solute redistribution. Nucleation is the early chapter of crystallization and is a key phenomenon in the theory of solidification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207