MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386454744 · doi:10.1002/9781119210801.ch1

Additive Manufacturing Process Classification, Applications, Trends, Opportunities, and Challenges

2021· other· en· W4386454744 on OpenAlexaff
Ehsan Toyserkani, Dyuti Sarker, Osezua Ibhadode, Farzad Liravi, Paola Russo, Katayoon Taherkhani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaminationProcess (computing)Manufacturing engineeringKey (lock)Computer scienceMaterials processingEngineeringMechanical engineeringTelecommunicationsNanotechnologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additive manufacturing (AM) is becoming a major research target for industrialized countries as they seek to regain leadership in manufacturing through innovation. AM has been considered a platform to convert digital models to physical parts in a short chain of processes, a platform facilitating a rapid move from “Art” to “Part” in a fancy analogy. This chapter helps the students to understand the standard definition of AM and seven standard classes of AM processes. These include: binder jetting, directed energy deposition, material extrusion, material jetting, powder bed fusion, sheet lamination, and VAT photopolymerization. The chapter also helps the students to gain knowledge basic knowledge on AM market size, and gain insight into applications of metal AM. Developing advanced AM-made antennas is an area of growth in the communication industry because telecommunication devices on earth continue to require more and more bandwidth. The chapter also presents an overview on the key concepts discussed in this book.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207