A Micropillar Array Based Microfluidic Device for Rare Cell Detection and Single-Cell Proteomics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Advancements in single-cell-related technologies have opened new possibilities for analyzing rare cells, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and rare immune cells. Among these techniques, single-cell proteomics, particularly single-cell mass spectrometric analysis (scMS), has gained significant attention due to its ability to directly measure transcripts without the need for specific reagents. However, the success of single-cell proteomics relies heavily on efficient sample preparation, as protein loss in low-concentration samples can profoundly impact the analysis. To address this challenge, an effective handling system for rare cells is essential for single-cell proteomic analysis. Herein, we propose a microfluidics-based method that offers highly efficient isolation, detection, and collection of rare cells (e.g., CTCs). The detailed fabrication process of the micropillar array-based microfluidic device is presented, along with its application for CTC isolation, identification, and collection for subsequent proteomic analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".