MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386458218 · doi:10.1111/irfi.12273

Issue Information

2020· paratext· en· W4386458218 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Review of Finance · 2020
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCarey Business School, Johns Hopkins UniversitySloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyShanghai University of Finance and EconomicsUniversiteit van TilburgUniversität ZürichUniversity of TorontoUniversity of New South WalesHong Kong University of Science and TechnologyTsinghua UniversityKU LeuvenGeorgetown UniversityNanyang Technological UniversityBoston CollegeImperial College LondonUniversity of WarwickUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Texas at AustinNational University of SingaporeMichigan State UniversityLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceUniversity of PittsburghCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityArizona State UniversityYork UniversityUniversity of MiamiUniversity of Notre DameUniversidad Carlos III de MadridPurdue University
KeywordsCitationComputer scienceInformation retrievalInternet privacyLibrary scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The International Review of Finance publishes high-quality research on all aspects of financial economics, including traditional areas such as asset pricing, corporate fi nance, market microstructure, financial intermediation and regulation, financial econometrics, financial engineering and risk management, as well as new areas such as markets and institutions of emerging market economies, especially those in the Asia-Pacific region. In addition, the Letters Section in IRF is a premium outlet of letter-length research in all fields of finance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7930.762

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Review of FinanceSame topicFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesFrench-language works237,207