Assessing the Performance of Satellite-Based Models for Crop Yield Estimation in the Canadian Prairies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Timely monitoring of crop production using a remote sensing-based approach offers promise toward enhancing food security. Statistical models developed using satellite data typically employ a single vegetation index from a single sensor for yield estimation. With the increasing availability of satellite datasets, there is now an opportunity to investigate the potential of available vegetation indices from different sensors in estimating yields. The key objective of this study was to develop a best-performing satellite-based yield model for the Canadian Prairies for wheat, barley, and canola, trained using municipality-level data from 2009 to 2019. We tested the statistical performance of models built using (a) indices from different sensors (Landsat and Sentinel-2), (b) indices sensitive to different yield properties, and (c) single versus multiple vegetation indices. Results showed Landsat-NDWI as the best performing single-index across all indices and sensors for each crop. Sentinel-2-EVI performed best for wheat and canola and Sentinel-2-SR for barley; but these models were built using only 4 years of data. We found that best-performing single-index models recorded similar predictive accuracy as multi-index models during model validation. The results from this work suggest that satellite-based yield estimation can be improved by selecting the right index related to different crop properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".