MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386462241 · doi:10.1007/s00464-023-10374-6

Training for excellence: using a multimodal videoconferencing platform to coach surgeons and improve intraoperative performance

2023· article· en· W4386462241 on OpenAlexafffund
Golsa Shafa, Parmiss Kiani, Caterina Masino, Allan Okrainec, Jesse D. Pasternak, Adnan Alseidi, Amin Madani

Bibliographic record

VenueSurgical Endoscopy · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical Simulation and Training
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)University of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
KeywordsCoachingCenter of excellenceVideoconferencingMedicineLikert scaleExcellencePhysical therapySession (web analytics)Medical educationDreyfus model of skill acquisitionProfessional developmentPsychologyMedical physicsMultimediaComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSurgical EndoscopySame topicSurgical Simulation and TrainingFrench-language works237,207