MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386465916 · doi:10.53555/sfs.v10i2.1532

A Study On Dendroclimatic Potential Of Chir Pine (Pinus Roxburghii) Grown In Bahali District Mansehra Kp Pakistan

2023· article· en· W4386465916 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Raja Wajahat Muqarrab, Tanvir Hussain, Muhammad Rizwan, Hasil Khan, Riaz Hussain Mari, Asfand Yar Butt, Ghulam Yasin Shaikh, Munir Hussain, Arz Muhammad Umrani, Safi Ullah, Muhammad Hassan Khalid, Tabarak Ashraf, Muhammad Sajawal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest ecology and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPinus roxburghiiForestryDendroclimatologyPrecipitationTemperate climateDendrochronologyPinus <genus>Environmental scienceClimate changeTemperate rainforestGeographyPhysical geographyBotanyEcologyBiologyMeteorologyEcosystemArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study is carried out to evaluate the dendro-climatic potential of Chir pine (Pinus roxburghi) growing under the moist temperate condition of Bahali forest area of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. For this purpose, wood material in the form of tree cores was extracted from healthy trees randomly. The cores were prepared for data measurement using standard laboratory procedures. Data regarding Total Ring Width (TRW) were measured with the help Win-Dendro System. The collected data were compiled and analyzed statistically using computer-based software Cofecha and R packages. Results showed that an increase of 309.3 mm in total annual precipitation and 0.426 C. This species reflected accepted mean sensitivity value (0.297) under these climatic conditions. The climate-growth relationship for 56 years (1965-2021) revealed that precipitation is acting as a limiting factor for the growth of this species and temperature is playing its optimum role. It was concluded that Chir Pine has tremendous dendro-climatic potential which is an indication that environmental changes had created impression on growth and developmental of the trees in the study area. Further, it is recommended that this species can be used for further research concerning, reconstruction of climatic parameters and other future issues of climate changes, but long-term chronology development is prerequisite

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences→Same topicForest ecology and management→French-language works237,207→