THE ROLE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN THE INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT OF INTERPRISES: in THE EXAMPLE OF SWEDEN
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Effective corporate governance is an important condition for the successful operation of an enterprise. Defining sustainable development and protecting the rights of shareholders, customers, and other stakeholders serves as the most important direction of the enterprise’s activities in the field of improving its financial efficiency. The family model of corporate governance, or family capitalism and family business groups, has become widespread in almost all countries of the world. Such a corporate governance system is often found in Asian and Latin American countries, in Canada, and in European countries (Sweden, Italy, and France). The management of the largest corporations is carried out by members of the same family. This article examines the features of the corporate governance system in foreign practice, in particular in Sweden, where theoretically and practically analyzed such issues as the evolution of theories and basic principles of corporate governance, the role of corporate governance in the investment support of enterprises, its modern methods and models, and institutional issues. In addition, corporate governance bodies in Sweden and their interaction with the executive body, the tasks and functions of regulatory bodies, corporate culture, assessment of the transparency of investments in enterprises, and the effectiveness of corporate governance, as well as the main stages of the process of preventing and combating the risk of corporate fraud, are analyzed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it