Acetic Acid Production From Lignocellulosic Biomass Pyrolysis and Recovery via Membrane Processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pyrolysis is a thermochemical conversion process designed for biomass decomposition in an oxygen-free environment. It typically operates within a temperature window of 200 to 800°C and generates various byproducts, including gases, liquid fractions (both aqueous and organic) such as bio-oil, and solids like char. Bio-oil is a significant product of pyrolysis. It is characterised by a complex blend of organic compounds. The acidic nature of bio-oil primarily originates from volatile acids, such as acetic acid. The recovery of acetic acid from bio-oil facilitates the use of the extracted substance as a precious resource, hence enhancing its significance in the framework of a circular bioeconomy. Acetic acid finds widespread application in manufacturing commercially important chemicals like vinyl acetate monomers and formulating phytosanitary products due to its inherent herbicidal and antifungal properties. However, to be used, acetic acid has to be separate from the raw bio-oil. Separation methodologies, including nanofiltration and reverse osmosis, demonstrate potential in recovering acidic constituents from bio-oil due to their high selectivity and effective system management. This article offers a concise review about acetic production from lignocellulosic biomass from pyrolysis and its recovery through various membrane separation processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".