MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386472827 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2023.3308198

Calculation and Conservation of Probability and Energy in the Numerical Solution of the Schrödinger Equation With the Finite- Difference Time-Domain Method

2023· article· en· W4386472827 on OpenAlexafffund
Fadime Bekmambetova, Piero Triverio

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of TorontoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsFinite difference methodSchrödinger equationConservation of energyEnergy conservationMathematical analysisMathematicsFinite differenceApplied mathematicsFinite-difference time-domain methodEnergy (signal processing)Time domainConservation lawPhysicsComputer scienceQuantum mechanicsEngineeringStatisticsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method is a widely used numerical technique for solving Maxwell’s equations. FDTD has also been applied to numerically solve the Schrödinger equation and coupled systems of Maxwell and Schrödinger equations. In this work, we study the properties of the FDTD method for the Schrödinger equation, specifically the conservation of probability and energy. We propose accurate expressions for the total numerical probability and energy contained in a region and for the flux of probability current and power through its boundary. We show that the proposed expressions satisfy the conservation laws under suitable conditions and demonstrate their connection to the Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy stability limit. We discuss how these findings can be used to create new stable FDTD algorithms for the Schrödinger equation in an intuitive and modular fashion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207